Kinship Circle
Share/Bookmark
SEARCH
Email List

WORDS
You Paid For It: Animal Testing
ALL   RESEARCH   FOOD   COMPANION   ENTERTAINMENT   FASHION   WILD   DISASTERS   TOOLS   POEMS
By Brenda Shoss, Kinship Circle
We create false data which, combined with the differences among species, make our efforts to apply the results to man, useless.
~  Dr. Roger E. Ulrich
Behaviorist psychologist


The animal model presumes an effect in one species occurs in another. Yet science says genetic, metabolic, physiological and psychological traits vary significantly from species to species. A drug metabolized in a pig, dog or mouse doesn't look like the same drug in a person.

DRUG RECALL OVERVIEW
ESTIMATE: $12 TO $18 BILLION A YEAR.
That's how many taxpayer dollars annually fund animal research. National Institutes of Health is the chief grant giver. But the full scope of cross-agency funding for a system flawed by duplication, fraud and human harm is publicly unknown. Fiscal conservatives, are you listening too?


  • YOU PAID FOR IT: $3 MILLION (So Far): A decades-long University of Wisconsin-Madison sound localization lab mutilates cats to ostensibly learn how human brains process sound. Holes are drilled in a cat's brain to screw in a steel column that stops head motion. A second surgery opens the cat's head to damage inner ears with toxic matter and lodge electrodes in both ears. Cats awaken completely deaf and are immobilized in nylon sacks for ongoing drills. Double-Trouble, an orange cat in lab photos, was starved and then rewarded if she looked at noise projected from various directions. Lab records note "neurological signs:" She twitches, her face is partially paralyzed and 3 months post-surgery a head wound is still "open, moist w/bloody purulent discharge." Before killed to dissect her brain, she appears "depressed." In 2013, USDA validates PETA allegations, citing UW for heating-pad burns to a cat, Broc, and "recurring infections…"

    "This work is not cited in studies on human hearing. It can be conducted ethically using sophisticated brain imaging and recording techniques in humans." Brain research expert, Dr. Lawrence Hansen, neuroscience/pathology prof., Univ. of Calif-San Diego School of Medicine



At California National Primate Research Center (Univ. of California, Davis) 14 baby rhesus macaque monkeys are dead from malnourishment. Another 5 mature monkeys are dead from gastrointestinal distress, infection and injury. Shoddy care is behind 19 fatalities at a facility that houses 5,000 primates for research on AIDS, autism, Alzheimer's, malaria, allergies and other human conditions. A 2/4/13 citation from U.S. Dept. of Agriculture faults UC Davis in the 2009-2010 deaths. Robert Gibbens, western director for USDA's Animal-Plant Health Inspection Service writes that UC Davis "failure to act on its own consistent findings of inanition and dehydration of nonhuman primate neonates constitutes a failure to provide adequate veterinary care under the Animal Welfare Act." In 2011, USDA cited UC Davis for experimentation upon a sick, balding monkey with chronic vomiting.

  • YOU PAID FOR IT: $220,000 ANNUALLY: In a UC Davis neuroscience lab, Dr. Kenneth Britten anchors monkeys by their heads to embed eye coils and brain electrodes. Many dead monkeys trail Dr. Britten's quest to so uncover "mechanisms of motion processing in cortex." For similar studies in 1992, he writes: "Rhesus monkeys were implanted with stainless-steel head holders and scleral search coils for monitoring eye movements…" In 2013, he describes experiments as "ongoing, complimented by multi-electrode recording…" Translation: No end in sight.

  • YOU PAID FOR IT: BILLIONS OF DOLLARS AND DECADES WASTED: Mice, the go-to model for human disease, are 100% inaccurate as data sources for fatal human ailments like sepsis, burns, trauma. A study, Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Feb 2013), backs what animal advocates have long gleaned from animal research flaws: Discrepancies between species (genetic, metabolic, anatomic, physiological, psychological) may render mice useless in immune system studies, including cancer and heart disease. The paper reveals why 150 animal-tested sepsis drugs fail in humans. Sepsis, full-body inflammation from infection, strikes 750,000 patients, one quarter of whom die, and annually costs $17 billion (U.S.).

    "They're so ingrained in trying to cure mice, they forget we're trying to cure humans." Ronald W. Davis, a Stanford University genomics expert and study co-author, said scientific journals initially rejected their paper.

Animal data creates false assumptions that can speed new drugs through clinical trials to market, but lead to unforeseen adverse drug reactions. Study investigators found that a particular gene is used in mice, while in humans, the similar gene is suppressed. If researchers disable the select gene in lab mice, the test drug is successful. Yet this variable, when applied to humans, can up fatal effects. Dr. Richard Hotchkiss, a Washington University researcher not involved in this study told New York Times: "This paper… argues strongly — go to the patients. Get their cells…their tissues whenever you can." To understand the disease process, "you have to go to the patients."

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTERS ARGUE THAT REPETITION = ANSWERS
It's a hard sell, given a lack of cures derived from animals induced with human disease/injury under conditions a human would never encounter. Animals exist in perpetual distress from repeated handling, intense confinement, noise, isolation, pain, fear… Stress hormones influence animal data (Laboratory Animal Science 2004) that shapes medical product development. In one study (Journal: Nature, March 2012) C. Glenn Begley, former head of global cancer research at Amgen, found 47 of 53 "landmark" findings can't even be reproduced. "It was shocking. Pharmaceutical industry relies on these findings." Failure was blamed, in part, on animal models irrelevant to cancers or other disease, in an academic arena that fosters poor science, even fraud, as researchers fight for funds.

"Funding violent experiments on cats means $3 million less is spent on research that can actually improve human health." Dr. Lawrence Hansen, neuroscience and pathology professor, University California-San Diego; named as one of the top 100 researchers in brain research field, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

  • YOU PAID FOR IT: $734,000 IN 2012: Since 1989, millions have funded primate tests for amblyopia ("lazy-eye" childhood disorder treatable if diagnosed early). University of Houston, College of Optometry, Vanderbilt University, and Nat'l Institute of Mental Health track sight growth via electrodes implanted in monkeys, some 2-weeks-old. Each monkey's neck is opened to insert a windpipe tube (tracheostomy). They're restrained in head frames for 2-4 days of electrical stimulation recording, then killed to dissect brains. "Not surprising" data shows many neural pathways act in a way already known in older monkeys, with no new visual acuity insights gained. "I've seen no evidence that this research has assisted management of amblyopia. Human clinical investigations have guided management of this condition." Board-certified ophthalmologist Dr. Stephen Kaufman, in practice 22 years, who reviewed research protocols for In Defense Of Animals

WHO PAYS FOR ALL THE LAB DO-OVERS?
Taxpayers bankroll agencies that fund medical research: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services (SAMHSA), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP), Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ), Office of Assistant Secretary of Health (OASH), Department of Defense (DOD)…National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the biggest, with 30-70% of its budget for animal research.

Academic research itself concedes that a highly competitive grant culture creates pressure for experimenters to churn out protocols, regardless of existing data or scientific validity. Each year, universities receive millions that help pay utility bills and other overhead. Indeed, quick money comes from animal research, not human-focused clinical or cell-line studies. "NIH under-funds patient-oriented research," (Committee on Addressing Career Paths for Clinical Research. National Academy Press, Bethesda, MD) with its biggest cut awarded to animal experimentation. A weak economy only heightens contests, with universities vying for a grant pool reduced by federal spending cuts.

BIG PHARMA OWNS MORE THAN CONGRESS
A 2012 feature from MoFo Tech, a think-tank for science/technology-based trends, identifies how pharma-firms forge "'arrangements with academia involving millions of dollars. Big Pharma and the academic institution agree jointly on which projects to fund, and in return for financing research, the company has first option to commercialize research results,' says Morrison & Foerster partner Van Ellis." The article, Sharing An Umbrella, notes a monetary bond, as more universities hope to evolve scholastic research into products. Plus, "universities are [always] looking for new sources of funding. These factors dovetail nicely with Big Pharma's needs." In fact, Pharma's capacity to invest tens of millions has resulted in joint steering committees that pick which academic research gets funding.



Animal Tested…And Recalled
ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS ARE 4TH LEADING CAUSE OF U.S. DEATH (FDA). 2 million+ people annually suffer ADR disability and hospitalization; 100,000 die (Journal of American Medical Assoc.). FDA records show 1,734 drug recalls, 2004-2011. But recalls average once a month (Brigham & Women's Hospital. 2012 Archives of Internal Medicine). FDA recalls just half of Class 1 drugs that may harm or kill humans.


spacer ZELNORM (Tegaserod): Gastrointestinal drug. FDA analysis shows increased risk for heart attack, stroke and cardiac chest pain in users.

HEPARIN (blood thinner): Recalled after 400+ allergic reactions and 19 people die.

MILRINONE (cardiac): Ups survival for rats induced with heart failure. In humans, 30% rise in mortality.

Animal tests are the baseline for all drug development.

FIALURINE (hepatitis): Dog-safe, liver failure in humans.

NOMIFENSINE (antidepressant): Okay in rats, rabbits, dogs, monkeys. Humans: liver poisoning, anemia.

ZOMAX (pain): Tests safe in animals. 14 humans die.

STREPTOMYCIN (antibiotic): Tests safe in dosed pigs, dogs, guinea pigs. Brain damage, deafness, blindness or death in human babies.

ARAVA (rheumatism): Deaths, liver reactions, high blood pressure, stroke, birth defects.

VIOXX, CELEBRAX, BEXTRA (Cox-2 inhibitors): Up human heart disease risk.

PREMARIN, PREMPRO (estrogen from pregnant mare urine): Wyeth-Ayerst endures recalls after NIH study, Women's Health Initiative, finds long-term use ups risk for coronary heart disease (CHD), breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism, endometrial and colorectal cancers, hip fracture, death.
spacer BAYCOL, MERIDIA, SERZONE, FEN-PHEN: Pulled or restricted after animal tests speed drugs along in development.

AMRINONE (cardiac): Shows promise in mice, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, dogs, rhesus monkeys. 20% of heart failure patients form thrombocytopenia. Some die.

CHLORAMPHENICOL (antibiotic): Dogs okay, cats die, cows tolerate, horses don’t. Susceptible humans: Antibiotic leads to life-threatening anemia and is so toxic its use is illegal in animals used for food.

CLIOQUINOL (anti-diarrheal): Tests safe in rats, cats, dogs, rabbits. Global recall: Blindness, paralysis in people.

DIETHYLSTILBESTROL (synthetic estrogen): Animal data green-lights this miscarriage-deterrent, yet it ups spontaneous abortion, premature birth, neonatal death.

ERALDIN (cardiac): Safe in mice, rats, dogs and monkeys. Acute side effects in 7,000 humans, 23 deaths.

ISUPREL (asthma): Dosing determined from animal tests. Asthmatics in Great Britain die.

FLOXIN (antibiotic): Proven safe in animals. Seizures, psychosis in people.

MANOPLAX (cardiac): Safe in tests on rats, mice, rabbits, cats, guinea pigs. Global recall; higher risk for hospitalization and/or death.

METHYSERGIDE (migraine): Symptoms can't be duplicated in animals. Severe scarring of heart, kidneys, abdominal vessels.
spacer Misleading animal data can speed new drugs from clinical trials to market, with unforeseen adverse effects.

OPREN (rheumatism, arthritis): No adverse effects in monkeys for 9 years. Recalled: 61 human deaths, 3,500 harmful reactions.

PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE [PPA] (in cold/flu remedies): FDA-banned after association with 200-500 strokes in young women per year.

PRIMACOR (cardiac/circulatory): Okay in rats. 30% death increase in people.

RITODRINE (deter premature labor): Approved in animal tests. Stimulates pulmonary edema, breathing complications, death in humans.

SUPROFEN (arthritis): Animal tests show "No cardiac, renal or central nervous system [side effects]." People suffer kidney toxicity.

TAMOXIFEN (breast cancer): Harmless to fetus of rabbits, monkeys. Non-predicted human effects: nausea, vomiting. Tied to uterine cancer, blood clots, memory loss, no periods, cataracts.

ETC…
spacer






Facebook Twitter YouTube Flickr Change.org Kinship Circle Store CafePress Store eBay Giving Works GoodSearch


spacer spacer KINSHIP CIRCLE
Animal Advocacy  |  Education  |  Disaster Aid

info@kinshipcircle.org  •  KinshipCircle.org  •  KinshipCircle.org/disasters
314-795-2646  |  7380 Kingsbury Blvd  |  Saint Louis, MO 63130 USA

●  Federal 501c3 under U.S. IRS ruling, Public Charity Status: 170b1Avi
●  Tax Employee Identification Number (EIN) available upon request
●  Nonprofit Certificate of Incorporation, Charter: N00071626
●  PRIVACY POLICY