By Brenda Shoss, 1/5/05 Dying For Kibble: IAMS Experiments On Cats And Dogs
Currently, the fur kids feast on natural vittles free of byproducts, chemicals and dyes. Awhile back, they ate Iams. Like many consumers, I bought the Iams Company vow of health and longevity. After all, Iams and Eukanuba pet foods undergo extensive research before they hit retail shelves. But People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) shattered my allegiance to Iams with a “dark and sordid secret.” It turns out the Procter & Gamble subsidiary funds tests on hundreds of cats and dogs—animals just like Stanley, Cleveland, Rebekkah and Isaiah. For nine months in 2002 and early 2003 a PETA spy worked inside an Iams–sponsored laboratory. At the time, Iams employed over 30 contract labs and university research centers to conduct off–site animal testing. PETA’s findings, available in broadcast video format, generally contradict Iams’ publicized research policy. Iams Company Research Policy, #4: “We will not fund or participate in any study requiring or resulting in the euthanasia of cats or dogs.” PETA’s investigator found 60 dazed dogs with muscle chunks severed from their thighs heaped on a cold, paint–flecked floor. Two dogs died post–surgery and at least 27 were killed over the course of the experiment. Iams Research Policy, #5: “Research will be closely monitored at internal and external facilities—with the goal being to eliminate even minor pain or discomfort.” PETA’s agent worked alongside inexperienced vet technicians. They advised her to revive dogs in respiratory failure by beating their chests. A lab tech toting a dead dog in a plastic bag told her the dog “bled out its mouth” before dying in his cage. Another worker recalled a live kitten flushed down a drain. She saw throat–implanted tubes pumping vegetable oil into dogs' bellies. Iams Research Policy, #3: “We will ensure the humane treatment of cats and dogs, and provide for animal well being, socialization and husbandry." PETA’s observer encountered “stir–crazy” animals restrained in steel cages or cement cells for up to six years. Dogs cried out in pain when their paws splayed over the metal–slat flooring. In one video segment dogs frantically circled empty enclosures as an aloof Iams representative passed by. Cats occupied a cinderblock room with unstable “resting” boards. One board fatally squashed a cat during the investigation. The lab director did not remove the illegal boards until warned about an impending inspection. Iams Research Policy, #3: “We will also meet or exceed standards established by the Animal Welfare Act of the US, the US Department of Agriculture and Directive 86/609/EEC of the European Union.” The investigator noted an extreme lack of veterinary care. Dogs with excessive tartar were unable to chew food. One dog limped due to untreated Lyme disease. A cat who hadn’t eaten for days perished without medical attention. During inspection, an Iams veterinarian ignored a dog who had just delivered puppies in a cement kennel with no bedding. Two dogs died inside the frigid building with 34–degree temperatures. Iams Research Policy, #1: “The results must help veterinarians and pet owners worldwide nutritionally enhance the well–being of cats and dogs.” Iams promises to not mutilate animals or conduct non–essential research. Yet PETA’s investigator saw lab techs repeatedly draw blood from dogs reserved for non–invasive metabolic studies. The blood was sold to other labs. A lab director ordered techs to cut dogs’ vocal cords because he had grown weary of their attention–seeking yelps. Iams did not halt the unnecessary debarking surgery. Before PETA’s exposition, the England–based group Uncaged combed science journals for Iams lab records. In 2001, the UK’s Sunday Express ran a front–page story disclosing Iams–funded experiments on cats, dogs and other animals. In response to allegations and bad press, Iams has pledged various reforms. Last fall, they announced arrangements to consolidate off–site testing within their Dayton facility by 2006. PETA calls plans to centralize over twice as many cats and dogs another example of Iams’ “token gestures.” At a 2004 Pet Food Forum, Iams’ Dan Carey introduced an initiative to reward animals 30 minutes of exercise/socialization on weekdays. This leaves 23–1/2 hours cooped in a cage. Carey feels the half–hour breaks enable dogs and cats to spend their “entire lives” in labs. Iams claims to now supply toys, behavior training, group play and care. Long–term caging is renamed “Lifetime Destiny” and unadoptable dogs spend their golden years in a “retirement center.” Some animals are reportedly adopted into loving homes. But Iams will not release files on the number of animals used, years of confinement, authenticity of adoptions, or existence of a retirement center. Moreover, Iams does not take responsibility for its leased animals. PETA asserts hundreds of beagles were left in “the same hideous conditions we found them in. Iams said they belonged to the [contract] laboratory.” Must some dogs and cats lead bleak lives so other dogs and cats can thrive? The
American Association of Feed Control Officers (AAFCO) does not legally require manufacturers to experiment on animals to earn its seal of approval. To confirm this, PETA attended AAFCO meetings and acquired written verification from the Food and Drug Administration. Nonetheless, Iams routinely subsidizes tests for palatability, discovery phase, and metabolized energy. Hills Science Diet, Nestlé Purina/Friskies (Alpo, Proplan, Gourmet), Pedigree, Menu Foods (Petsmart Authority, Award, Safeway Select), and other brands also fund animal experiments. Pet–food producers are only obligated to reveal nutritional content, which can be evaluated through chemical analysis of ingredients as well as harmless in–home trials. Some companies collaborate with veterinary clinics in voluntary trials that use animals with preexisting conditions. Over 40 companion–animal food makers rely upon a humane testing protocol. According to PETA, Iams pursues animal experimentation more discreetly nowadays. For example, they may underwrite a chair position at a university with nutritional trial labs or sponsor vivisection–related conferences. The Federal Trade Commission believes Iams’ research policy, published on its website, may mislead consumers and violate “Section 5 of the FTC Act.” In the UK, Iams is under investigation by the Advertising Standards Authority. Personally, I won’t purchase food from a company until it commits to a no–animal testing policy. For my money, the best companion cuisine is the one without “misery” in its list of ingredients. WHAT YOU CAN DO PHOTOS:Animals from the Iams contract laboratory PETA investigated (2002–2003).
To reprint this article in your publication, web site or list, please request author permission: info@kinshipcircle.org Kinship Circle’s column runs bimonthly in The Healthy Planet. Ms. Shoss is also a contributing writer for The Animals Voice, Satya Magazine, VegNews, and other publications. If you would like to reprint this column, please request author permission at info@kinshipcircle.org
The Iams Company: A Legacy of Animal Testing But behind the promise of health and longevity are some less fortunate cats and dogs locked inside sterile laboratories for a lifetime of experimentation. The Iams Company denies allegations of invasive animal testing. Yet data from Iams-funded research on hundreds of animals is recorded in scientific journals: AUGUST 1991: Kidneys are extracted from dogs who undergo invasive tests and are
eventually killed. SUMMARY: To induce “rapid onset, severe symptoms” associated with acute renal failure, the right kidneys are removed from 24 young mix–breed dogs. Through two incisions in the abdomen, one kidney is dislodged. Blood flow to the remaining kidney is obstructed to impair 75% kidney function and leave dogs with 1/8 of their normal renal capacity. When kidneys fail, accumulated waste in the blood leads to poisoning and eventual death. Dogs may experience "depression, loss of appetite, thirst and vomiting. The back may be arched, and there may be stiffness. There is fever, and sometimes ulcers are present in the mouth." (Black's Veterinary Dictionary: 292) For this study, 22 dogs are analyzed up to 14 months. Four dogs are euthanized due to severe uremia (Oxford Medical Dictionary: “The presence of excessive amounts of... waste products in the blood... occurs in kidney failure and results in nausea, vomiting, lethargy, drowsiness and eventually death.' Black's Veterinary Dictionary: “Death may be preceded by convulsions and unconsciousness.”) Eight dogs are destroyed after seven months to observe their diseased kidneys. Another 10 dogs are killed seven months later. From 2001 front–page expose´ in the UK’s Sunday Express: “...24 young dogs had
their right kidneys removed and the left partly damaged to investigate how protein
affects dogs with kidney failure. Eight dogs were killed to analyse the kidney
tissue. Dogs which became sick were not treated because it would have
undermined the test results."
APRIL 1994: The stomachs of 16 German Shepherds are repetitively cut to excise
sections of their intestines. MAY 1994: 6 dogs undergo invasive techniques to evaluate bacterial overgrowth in
their small intestines. SEPTEMBER 1994: Kidneys are extracted from 31 older dogs to stimulate renal
damage. Surviving dogs are examined for 48 months, then killed and dissected. 1996: Stomachs are sliced open and tubes affixed to the intestines of 15 dogs. Every
10 minutes within a 2–hour time block, stomach contents are mechanically purged
through the tubes. All dogs are killed at the end of the experiment. 1996: Dogs’ intestines are exposed and bonded outside their bodies to study the
effects of dietary fibers. JUNE 1996: After the kidneys of 18 healthy beagle puppies are chemically damaged,
they are fed trial diets and tubes are implanted into their penises. All puppies are
killed when the study ends. 1997: Portions of large intestines are surgically cut out of 28 dogs to review the
influence of dietary fiber. 1998: Bones from the front and hind legs of 18 dogs are surgically exposed and irritated until they fracture. 1998: 28 cats are surgically manipulated into kidney failure. Those who do not die are
later killed to gauge the repercussions of protein on diseased kidneys. 1998: Intestinal pieces are removed through the sliced open bellies of 16 dogs. 1998: Intestinal sections are removed and immune systems are agitated in 16 dogs to
explore the effects of fiber. 1998: Tissue samples from large and small intestines are extracted from 5 dogs to
assess intestinal tract requirements. JULY 1998: To evaluate wound recovery during the inflammatory stage, 30 dogs are
purposefully injured. Skin patches containing the wounds are cut from their bodies. DECEMBER 1998: After killing six healthy Great Dane puppies, experimenters “mince,
lyophilize, fat extract with light petrol, dry and grind” the 6–month–old dogs to wage a
“total body analysis.” 1999: Tubes grafted into the intestines of 6 dogs regularly drain fluids in an
experimental attempt to weigh the efficacy of high–starch flours in canine diets. MARCH 1999: 10 dogs are destroyed to analyze how dietary fiber impacts canines. 2000: In a two–hour operation, the stomachs of 28 cats are laid open to allow experimenters
to watch reactions to fiber ingestion. SUMMARY: Short–hair female cats, ages 2–5, are divided into sets of two or three, caged indoors, and fed various diets for 2–3 weeks. One cat is discarded for “a unthrifty appearance.” Animals anesthetized for the “colonic perfusion study” are positioned on their sides, their abdomens are split open, and a catheter is installed in their colons. A tube is also forced inside each animal’s rectum. After their bowels are flushed, a test solution is pumped through the empty bowels and collected every ten minutes over two hours. During the next phase of the study, sections of the caecum and colon are extracted. The paper does not indicate whether cats are killed before, during or after this phase. From UK’s Sunday Express report on Iams cat/dog experimentation: “In another experiment, the stomachs of 28 cats were exposed so scientists could analyse the effects of feeding them fibre. The animals were operated on for at least two hours and then killed." MAY 2000: 24 female cats are sterilized and over–fed until clinically obese, followed by
drastic food–reduction to imitate “rapid weight loss in cats.” Three liver biopsies are
performed on the cats during testing. SUMMARY: The paper details 24 female cats, ages 2–5, purchased from a commercial dealer and confined separately. Each cat is "ovariohysterectomized" and then fed a "high quality energy dense diet" (The Iams Company’s Eukanuba) until all are clinically obese (at least 30% over normal body weight) by the eighty day point. The experimenters comment: “Obese cats are reported to be at greater risk for development of certain diseases, such as osteoarthritis, ligament injuries, perineal dermatitis (inflammation of the skin around the genitals), diabetes mellitus, lower urinary tract disease, and cardiomyopathy (heart disease). Mortality risk is also increased." Following the obesity phase of the study, the cats undergo a 7–8 week crash diet, consuming 25% of their “energy requirements” until they lose “30 to 40% of their obese body weight.” During this stage, designed to emulate “rapid weight loss in cats,” two cats are unable to ingest even a quarter of their nutritional requirements. The experimenters admit: “Safe, rapid weight loss in cats can be difficult, because cats have special dietary requirements that appear to make them more susceptible than other species to HL." HL, or hepatic lipidosis, is a form of liver disease that leads to impaired liver function. The paper describes three cats who progress to HL as a result of the accelerated “weight loss period.” All of the cats endure three invasive liver biopsies during the study. From UK’s Express report on Iams cat/dog experimentation: “The research team sterilised 24 female cats, which were over–fed until they become obese. They were then starved on a crash diet and when they had lost a third of their weight their livers were examined to investigate the link between weight loss and liver disease." 2000: New–born husky puppies are injected with live virus vaccines and allergens to
elicit chronic allergic response. SUMMARY: This paper imparts data about 11 “Crossbred sled” new born puppies injected with a cocktail of attenuated live virus vaccines—Distemper, hepatitis and parvovirus—10 times over the first 85 days of life. Food antigens are also administered subcutaneously. Three more non–sensitised dogs undergo the same procedures as the rest of the test group. To determine if the animals have been “successfully sensitised,” skin tests are conducted at six and 10 months of age, with no reference to use of local or genera anesthetic. Food allergens (soy, casein, chicken liver) are injected “intradermally” at four potency levels. Low–strength doses generally provoke a skin reaction. Highmagnitude injections are 100,000 times stronger than lowest concentration injections (0.02 micrograms vs 2000 micrograms). Some high–concentration injections trigger welts similar to large hives in appearance. Allergens are also injected into each puppy’s stomach lining to probe gastroscopic food sensitivity. The higher strength inoculations prompt expansion of blood capillaries (erythema & oedema), resulting in moderate to severe inflammation with fluid–filled bulges and redness. Skin and stomach test results are monitored for a month, while the puppies consume allergic diets. The experimenters record: “[All 11 puppies] develop moderate to severe diarrhea and lose weight. Furthermore 8 of the 11 sensitised dogs demonstrate dermatological reactions that include hair loss and pruritis [eczema–like itching]... Clinical signs develop within the first week of feeding the sensitising diet and persist as long as the diet is provided... Moderate to severe pruritis, with and without lesions, is also observed in sensitised dogs receiving diets containing the allergens.” From the UK’s Express 2001 report: “The company also sponsored research in which 14 husky puppies were repeatedly injected with live vaccines and allergy causing proteins for the first 12 weeks of their lives. They developed permanent illnesses in the test, which was designed to see how severely allergic they would become." 2000: For a study predicated on the rationale that dogs with drab coats “are not handled
as much,” chest wounds are repeatedly inflicted upon 36 dogs to establish the
role of diet in fur regrowth. SUMMARY: Under local anesthetic, two 6mm portions of skin are biopsied from each of 12 Siberian Huskies, 12 Miniature Poodles, and 12 Labrador Retrievers (puppies and older dogs) every three weeks for 18 weeks. By the end of the experiment, each dog sustains 12 body wounds. The experimenters acknowledge: “Overall, there is little to distinguish the dogs fed the high– and low–quality diets.” The final experiment referred to in the UK’s Express story: "Twelve huskies, 12 poodles and 12 labradors were regularly given chest wounds to see if diet could affect fur regrowth. This was justified in the study on the grounds that 'dogs are enjoyable to touch and look at. Dogs with coat problems are simply not handled as much.' " 2000: Bone and cartilage is surgically extracted from healthy puppies, chicks and rats
to observe bone and joint regeneration. 2000: The ovaries and uteruses of 56 dogs are removed to contemplate how beta
carotene impacts “reproductive performance.” 2000: Tubes are implanted through the chests of 8 healthy dogs to examine fat
absorption. 2003: Shortly before joining the Iams research team, Patrick Gavin leads study to
determine the safety and precision of “intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)” in 15 young adult dogs. SUMMARY: Dogs are exposed to high–level radiation that causes pathological
weakening of the spinal cord (myelomalacia). All dogs are killed upon conclusion of
the study. Gavin’s published research paper states: “[W]e wanted to deliver a [radi
ation] dose likely to cause severe damage to the spinal cord… The six dogs in
Group A developed severe neurologic dysfunction... [T]he dogs were unable to support weight or walk.” |